Counter Cyclical Program in Valley County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 603
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Valley County, Montana totaled $600,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kimberly Ann Lacey | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,981 |
82 | John R Lacey | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,981 |
83 | Moose Farms Inc | Frazer, MT 59225 | $1,977 |
84 | Cheryl Lynn Uphaus | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,962 |
85 | Cotton Family Rev Liv Trust - Richard A Cotton | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,955 |
86 | Gilbert E Fauth | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,952 |
87 | Fast Farms Inc | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,929 |
88 | Power Tech Farms Inc | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,892 |
89 | Paul K Buchmann | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,851 |
90 | Galen D Zerbe | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,828 |
91 | Ben L Wedel | Glendive, MT 59330 | $1,820 |
92 | Marietta Olfert | Frazer, MT 59225 | $1,806 |
93 | Jason Sauer | Nashua, MT 59248 | $1,795 |
94 | Renee Dayle Fettig | Frazer, MT 59225 | $1,793 |
95 | Honrud Family Revocable Living Tr | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,771 |
96 | A W Pratt Revocable Trust | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $1,753 |
97 | Toews Farms Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $1,748 |
98 | Bryce H Nichols | Frazer, MT 59225 | $1,730 |
99 | Dennis M Boucher | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $1,728 |
100 | Kurt Kummerfeldt | Nashua, MT 59248 | $1,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”