Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Wheatland County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 79
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Wheatland County, Montana totaled $665,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Shane L Hooker | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $3,656 |
42 | Sam Griffith | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,487 |
43 | Ian Glennie | Billings, MT 59106 | $3,182 |
44 | Clements Ranch Company LLC | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,125 |
45 | Ronald Fischer | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $2,997 |
46 | Carol J Gaugler | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $2,974 |
47 | Robert A Willems | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $2,958 |
48 | Paul Bradley | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $2,847 |
49 | Arla J. Hablutzel | Billings, MT 59106 | $2,793 |
50 | Kirk R Warner And Elloise G Warner Rev Lvg Trust | Glendora, CA 91741 | $2,336 |
51 | Cavan Spencer Cooney LLC | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $2,170 |
52 | Janet Harper - Janet E. Harper Revocable Trust | Billings, MT 59106 | $2,104 |
53 | John C Olson | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $2,034 |
54 | Darrell Lemmon | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $1,903 |
55 | Robin Ann Lemmon | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $1,903 |
56 | Wayne E Cavill | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $1,809 |
57 | Gordon Jones | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $1,530 |
58 | Donna Blatter | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $1,493 |
59 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $1,291 |
60 | Randy Decock Dba Grand Duke Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $1,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”