Total Conservation Programs in Wheatland County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 179
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Wheatland County, Montana totaled $25,403,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Careless Creek Ranch | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $151,174 |
42 | Anderson Family Trust | Billings, MT 59102 | $141,302 |
43 | E.l. Peterson Ranch Inc. | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $138,324 |
44 | Henry J Lode Living Trust | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $131,582 |
45 | Jenkins Ranch LLC | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $118,368 |
46 | Wayne E Cavill | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $118,242 |
47 | Julius Debuf | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $116,164 |
48 | Bryson Warner | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $114,938 |
49 | Todd K Anderson | Billings, MT 59102 | $111,993 |
50 | Edgar Langston | Snohomish, WA 98296 | $110,953 |
51 | David W Baird | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $108,354 |
52 | Kenneth H Yerger Jr | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $107,862 |
53 | Julia Debuff | Billings, MT 59105 | $107,451 |
54 | Harrison Flp | Billings, MT 59102 | $104,789 |
55 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $89,242 |
56 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $88,925 |
57 | Dennis Clark | Stanfield, OR 97875 | $85,104 |
58 | Perry Langston | Snohomish, WA 98296 | $84,441 |
59 | Anderson Family Trust | Billings, MT 59102 | $80,910 |
60 | Lloyd A Twite Family Partnership | Missoula, MT 59803 | $78,545 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”