Direct Payment Program in Wheatland County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 184
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Wheatland County, Montana totaled $9,253,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sterling Hoge | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $26,151 |
62 | W. George Snider | Billings, MT 59106 | $25,985 |
63 | Janet G Hill | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $25,311 |
64 | Chad L Olson | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $25,175 |
65 | Levi Jenkins | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $24,112 |
66 | Lyle E Colby | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $22,853 |
67 | Kirk R Warner And Elloise G Warner Rev Lvg Trust | Glendora, CA 91741 | $22,484 |
68 | Greg Obert | Roberts, MT 59070 | $22,443 |
69 | Donald L Dalgarno | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $21,896 |
70 | Thomas N Glennie Jr | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $21,539 |
71 | Jenkins Ranch LLC | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $20,474 |
72 | Joan Schwers | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $20,135 |
73 | Elwood Schwers | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $20,135 |
74 | Edward H Lode | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $19,974 |
75 | Skyline Montana House Lp | San Anselmo, CA 94960 | $19,165 |
76 | Kenneth B Olson | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $18,963 |
77 | Britt A Romain | Laurel, MT 59044 | $17,174 |
78 | Bradley Lode | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $16,332 |
79 | Darla J Jeffers | Roundup, MT 59072 | $15,547 |
80 | Grand Duke Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $15,370 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”