Farm Subsidy information
Wheatland County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Wheatland County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 149
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wheatland County, Montana totaled $4,634,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bradley Lode | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $5,557 |
82 | Carol J Gaugler | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $5,485 |
83 | Dicks Inc | Richey, MT 59259 | $5,273 |
84 | Judy Lode | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $5,214 |
85 | Ronald Fischer | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $5,178 |
86 | John H Whelan | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $4,822 |
87 | Karen D Osborne | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $4,560 |
88 | Stacey Ackerman | Sheffield Lake, OH 44054 | $4,474 |
89 | Randy Decock Dba Grand Duke Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $4,392 |
90 | Joan F Griffith | Billings, MT 59102 | $4,269 |
91 | Russell Berg | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $3,939 |
92 | John Crowley | Laurel, MT 59044 | $3,882 |
93 | Roger Lindsley | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,882 |
94 | Larry D Berg | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $3,813 |
95 | Dale Mager | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,767 |
96 | Snowbank Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $3,674 |
97 | Michael Baker | Berlin, PA 15530 | $3,537 |
98 | Craig Martin | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $3,440 |
99 | Darrel L Dick | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,013 |
100 | Robert A Willems | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $2,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”