Market Loss Assistance Program in Wheatland County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 165
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Wheatland County, Montana totaled $3,179,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas N Glennie Jr | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $6,629 |
82 | Harrison Flp | Billings, MT 59102 | $6,489 |
83 | Snelling Ranch Co | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $6,053 |
84 | Carol J Gaugler | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $6,044 |
85 | Clinton S Stagner | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $6,041 |
86 | Lode Family Living Trust | Billings, MT 59101 | $5,775 |
87 | Geraldine Jones | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $5,670 |
88 | Douglas A Ross | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $5,603 |
89 | Lazy Kk Land & Cattle Co | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $5,571 |
90 | Robert C Conley | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $5,405 |
91 | Mary Griffith | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $5,329 |
92 | Darla J Jeffers | Roundup, MT 59072 | $5,028 |
93 | Terry Vorhes | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $4,781 |
94 | Julie Thorson | Huntley, MT 59037 | $4,289 |
95 | Hellen Warner Estate | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $4,280 |
96 | Anderson Family Trust | Billings, MT 59102 | $4,173 |
97 | Kenneth B Olson | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $4,121 |
98 | Cooney Brothers Family Lmt Partne | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,925 |
99 | Cooney Brothers | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,921 |
100 | Bill Hanser Ranch | Broadview, MT 59015 | $3,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”