Total Commodity Programs in Wibaux County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 684
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wibaux County, Montana totaled $33,534,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Dominic Begger | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $44,392 |
142 | Bonita J Woods | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $44,031 |
143 | Western Coop Credit Union ** | Williston, ND 58802 | $43,650 |
144 | Mur-dar Inc | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $43,059 |
145 | Brian Dean Sarsland | Beach, ND 58621 | $42,541 |
146 | Hay Creek Ranch Inc | Glendive, MT 59330 | $42,451 |
147 | James Patrick Zielsdorf | Beach, ND 58621 | $41,306 |
148 | Leonard Bruski | Auburn, WA 98002 | $41,085 |
149 | Clay Farstveet | Beach, ND 58621 | $40,858 |
150 | Stephen R Gonsioroski | Baker, MT 59313 | $40,804 |
151 | Mark Andrew Begger | Beach, ND 58621 | $40,645 |
152 | Max Lorbiecke | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $40,563 |
153 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $40,435 |
154 | Albert Michels Estate | Tucson, AZ 85749 | $40,379 |
155 | Steen Farms Inc | Baker, MT 59313 | $40,337 |
156 | Melvin Leroy Bosserman | Golva, ND 58632 | $40,002 |
157 | Peter B Schieffer | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $39,743 |
158 | Frank C Michels Estate | Beach, ND 58621 | $39,025 |
159 | Marion Thompson | North Baltimore, OH 45872 | $38,908 |
160 | Henry Schieffer | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $38,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”