Conservation Reserve Program in Yellowstone County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 443
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Yellowstone County, Montana totaled $40,361,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rebecca Lynne Erickson | Broadview, MT 59015 | $121,500 |
102 | Conover Ranch Inc | Broadview, MT 59015 | $121,299 |
103 | Cynthia A Staley | Laurel, MT 59044 | $119,808 |
104 | Edna Popelka Trust | Billings, MT 59105 | $119,297 |
105 | Popelka Enterprises LLC | Billings, MT 59105 | $118,832 |
106 | Vince Ames Living Trust | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $118,205 |
107 | Dale Osness | Pompeys Pillar, MT 59064 | $116,432 |
108 | Wolf Spring Ranch Inc | Custer, MT 59024 | $115,876 |
109 | Clinton Mcfarland Family Trust | Molt, MT 59057 | $113,573 |
110 | Ginger R Silvers | Molt, MT 59057 | $112,464 |
111 | Susan Swartz | Broadview, MT 59015 | $110,870 |
112 | Allan C Olsen | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $109,960 |
113 | Sandbak Irrevocable Family Trust | Broadview, MT 59015 | $108,916 |
114 | Paul Mushaben | Broadview, MT 59015 | $106,679 |
115 | Mary Mosdal - Mosdal 1st Amended Family Trust | Billings, MT 59102 | $106,427 |
116 | Alferd Supanik Estat | Fallon, MT 59326 | $105,755 |
117 | Sannes Family Limited Partnership | Littleton, CO 80123 | $104,222 |
118 | Echo LLC | Billings, MT 59106 | $103,634 |
119 | Indian Creek Ranch | Huntley, MT 59037 | $103,575 |
120 | Sannes Family Limited Partnership | Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 | $103,012 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”