Conservation Reserve Program in Yellowstone County, Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 443

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Yellowstone County, Montana totaled $40,361,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101Rebecca Lynne EricksonBroadview, MT 59015$121,500
102Conover Ranch IncBroadview, MT 59015$121,299
103Cynthia A StaleyLaurel, MT 59044$119,808
104Edna Popelka TrustBillings, MT 59105$119,297
105Popelka Enterprises LLCBillings, MT 59105$118,832
106Vince Ames Living TrustRed Lodge, MT 59068$118,205
107Dale OsnessPompeys Pillar, MT 59064$116,432
108Wolf Spring Ranch IncCuster, MT 59024$115,876
109Clinton Mcfarland Family TrustMolt, MT 59057$113,573
110Ginger R SilversMolt, MT 59057$112,464
111Susan SwartzBroadview, MT 59015$110,870
112Allan C OlsenFairfield, MT 59436$109,960
113Sandbak Irrevocable Family TrustBroadview, MT 59015$108,916
114Paul MushabenBroadview, MT 59015$106,679
115Mary Mosdal - Mosdal 1st Amended Family TrustBillings, MT 59102$106,427
116Alferd Supanik EstatFallon, MT 59326$105,755
117Sannes Family Limited PartnershipLittleton, CO 80123$104,222
118Echo LLCBillings, MT 59106$103,634
119Indian Creek RanchHuntley, MT 59037$103,575
120Sannes Family Limited PartnershipHighlands Ranch, CO 80129$103,012

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag