Farm Subsidy information
Yellowstone County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Yellowstone County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 2,512
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yellowstone County, Montana totaled $219,106,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Indian Creek Ranch | Huntley, MT 59037 | $279,785 |
162 | Darren Miller | Billings, MT 59106 | $278,525 |
163 | Karman Ranches LLC | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $277,668 |
164 | Bradley Hoffman | Custer, MT 59024 | $276,393 |
165 | David Peil | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $275,429 |
166 | Randall Hultgren | Billings, MT 59102 | $274,368 |
167 | Gary M Davis | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $273,764 |
168 | Ed Kraft Jr | Billings, MT 59106 | $273,526 |
169 | William F Kukes | Laurel, MT 59044 | $271,187 |
170 | Stephen R Oblander | Ballantine, MT 59006 | $269,236 |
171 | Mark Watson | Pompeys Pillar, MT 59064 | $268,061 |
172 | Derks Brothers Grain & Cattle Inc | Denton, MT 59430 | $267,707 |
173 | Jay O Stovall | Billings, MT 59101 | $264,805 |
174 | Clinton Schmidt | Molt, MT 59057 | $264,278 |
175 | Gilbert Land & Livestock LLC | Billings, MT 59105 | $263,813 |
176 | Richard H Cooper | Billings, MT 59101 | $263,055 |
177 | Ray Milam | Billings, MT 59107 | $257,200 |
178 | Everett A Gabel | Billings, MT 59101 | $257,088 |
179 | Mary Ahern | Broadview, MT 59015 | $256,567 |
180 | Heidema Farms Inc | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $255,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”