Production Flexibility Program in Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 92,098
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $2,487,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | T-t Farms Inc | Gresham, NE 68367 | $277,933 |
202 | T & H Farming Inc | Bartlett, NE 68622 | $277,908 |
203 | Wynot River Farms | Omaha, NE 68118 | $277,662 |
204 | Keene Farms Inc | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $277,496 |
205 | Benish Farms Inc | Gurley, NE 69141 | $277,456 |
206 | Lauber Seed Farms | Geneva, NE 68361 | $277,343 |
207 | Maaske Farms Ltd Ptr | Oxford, NE 68967 | $276,954 |
208 | Larry L Frerichs | Wymore, NE 68466 | $276,775 |
209 | 96 Ranches Inc 2002 | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $276,633 |
210 | Double S P Farms Inc | Tilden, NE 68781 | $276,339 |
211 | Kimberly Farms Inc | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $276,301 |
212 | Philip D High | Bertrand, NE 68927 | $276,214 |
213 | Zimmerman Insurance Agency Inc | Battle Creek, NE 68715 | $275,948 |
214 | Maddux Cattle Co | Imperial, NE 69033 | $275,935 |
215 | John D Nielsen | Alliance, NE 69301 | $275,681 |
216 | 3e Farms Inc | Belvidere, NE 68315 | $275,568 |
217 | Michael Thom | Minden, NE 68959 | $275,492 |
218 | Double A Farms Inc | Trenton, NE 69044 | $275,376 |
219 | Glr Farms | Trumbull, NE 68980 | $275,266 |
220 | Summitcrest Inc | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $275,104 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”