Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 48,592
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Nebraska totaled $1,216,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Elting 1950 | Edgar, NE 68935 | $447,670 |
62 | Hughes Family Farms Inc | Venango, NE 69168 | $447,487 |
63 | Rg Cattle LLC | Fairbury, NE 68352 | $447,425 |
64 | J.e.m. Livestock, Inc. | Brunswick, NE 68720 | $446,476 |
65 | V Hansen Land & Cattle Co | Herman, NE 68029 | $442,266 |
66 | Moore Farms | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $433,872 |
67 | Dose Land & Cattle | Hampton, NE 68843 | $428,739 |
68 | Hanchera Farms | Danbury, NE 69026 | $423,138 |
69 | Triple G Farms Partnership | Louisville, NE 68037 | $422,697 |
70 | Hough Farms | David City, NE 68632 | $415,996 |
71 | H3 | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $409,524 |
72 | Double K Farms | Valentine, NE 69201 | $407,125 |
73 | Daniels Produce LLC | Columbus, NE 68601 | $406,240 |
74 | Aden Diversified Ag Partnership | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $405,552 |
75 | Pigcents Inc | Carroll, NE 68723 | $404,570 |
76 | Mccarty Farms-beaver City-llc | Colby, KS 67701 | $402,088 |
77 | Rowe Inc | Elwood, NE 68937 | $400,469 |
78 | Dcn Farms Joint Venture | Imperial, NE 69033 | $399,991 |
79 | Pandorf Land & Cattle Inc | Callaway, NE 68825 | $399,801 |
80 | Monahan Cattle Co | Hyannis, NE 69350 | $399,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”