Farm Subsidy information
Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 182,668
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nebraska totaled $29,103,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Weborg Farms | Pender, NE 68047 | $3,127,605 |
82 | Merna Valley Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $3,123,230 |
83 | Taylor Farms General Partnership | Ames, NE 68621 | $3,117,069 |
84 | Spurgin Inc | Paxton, NE 69155 | $3,104,453 |
85 | Rowe Inc | Elwood, NE 68937 | $3,102,360 |
86 | Western Nebraska Farm Company A G | Venango, NE 69168 | $3,101,353 |
87 | Amsberry Farms Ltd | Ansley, NE 68814 | $3,067,331 |
88 | Rempe Farms | Superior, NE 68978 | $3,054,695 |
89 | Christensen Cattle Co Inc | Fullerton, NE 68638 | $3,036,562 |
90 | D & D Farms | Kearney, NE 68847 | $3,026,129 |
91 | Bender Bros | Lindsay, NE 68644 | $3,022,070 |
92 | Rodney Edward Rohde | Emerson, NE 68733 | $3,017,535 |
93 | B & C Farms | Axtell, NE 68924 | $3,005,180 |
94 | Hoehn Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $3,004,838 |
95 | Sweeney Farm Acct Ptnsp | Loomis, NE 68958 | $2,987,940 |
96 | Krause Family Farms Inc | Plainview, NE 68769 | $2,984,974 |
97 | Reesman Investment Corp | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $2,976,737 |
98 | Lisa Reinick | Haigler, NE 69030 | $2,975,320 |
99 | Jim Reinick | Haigler, NE 69030 | $2,950,569 |
100 | Walking C Cattle Co | Lexington, NE 68850 | $2,948,876 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”