Conservation Reserve Program in Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 47,139
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $2,032,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | La Costa Plenty LLC | Boerne, TX 78006 | $728,485 |
122 | Glau Farms | Centennial, CO 80016 | $725,668 |
123 | Jeffers Farms Inc | Hayes Center, NE 69032 | $721,022 |
124 | Frank S Rothell | Tecumseh, NE 68450 | $716,842 |
125 | Kenneth Gehrke | Kimball, NE 69145 | $716,346 |
126 | Elm Tree Farm Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $713,480 |
127 | Dan C Wittwer | Dawson, NE 68337 | $713,070 |
128 | Joan K Phillips Revocable Trust | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $710,660 |
129 | Burnell Shifflet | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $710,121 |
130 | Leland V Nelson | Bushnell, NE 69128 | $708,870 |
131 | Gilbert Gigax | Estes Park, CO 80517 | $706,359 |
132 | M Scott Doht | Lyons, NE 68038 | $703,521 |
133 | Timothy A Brewer | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $702,029 |
134 | Elaine Roschewski | Palisade, NE 69040 | $700,466 |
135 | Ray Ranch LLC | Chappell, NE 69129 | $699,156 |
136 | Houston Farms Inc | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $698,683 |
137 | Weldon Marotz Sr | Stanton, NE 68779 | $698,621 |
138 | Shirley A Mathewson | Sidney, NE 69162 | $698,225 |
139 | Jk Farms Partnership | Omaha, NE 68130 | $696,756 |
140 | Richard D Wolfe | North Platte, NE 69101 | $694,266 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”