Farm Subsidy information
Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 176,438
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nebraska totaled $26,968,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kaliff Farms | York, NE 68467 | $13,432,101 |
2 | C J Farms Gen Ptnr | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $12,074,128 |
3 | Sandahl Farms | Wakefield, NE 68784 | $9,977,636 |
4 | H R W Farm Partnership | Friend, NE 68359 | $9,575,553 |
5 | Marsh Farms | Hartington, NE 68739 | $9,212,649 |
6 | Andersen Family Farms | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $8,867,878 |
7 | Danielski Harvesting & Farming | Valentine, NE 69201 | $8,775,227 |
8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $6,776,325 |
9 | Niewohner Farming Enterprise | Albion, NE 68620 | $6,728,906 |
10 | Tri-s Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $6,472,319 |
11 | Niobrara Farms | Atkinson, NE 68713 | $6,284,579 |
12 | J D Hirschfeld & Sons | Benedict, NE 68316 | $5,870,648 |
13 | Murdoch Partnership | Orleans, NE 68966 | $5,697,180 |
14 | Stromberger & Sons Partnership | Imperial, NE 69033 | $5,511,546 |
15 | Moore Farms | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $5,500,770 |
16 | D K Buskirk & Sons Ptnr | Hemingford, NE 69348 | $5,330,746 |
17 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $5,253,911 |
18 | Sundog Partnership | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $5,120,071 |
19 | Jsmm Farms Partnership | Albion, NE 68620 | $5,066,807 |
20 | Orville Hoffschneider & Sons | Waco, NE 68460 | $4,890,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>