Total Commodity Programs in Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 159,165
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Nebraska totaled $17,281,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Chohon Farms | Oneill, NE 68763 | $3,676,570 |
42 | Wallinger Farm Partnership | Stuart, NE 68780 | $3,652,601 |
43 | Hanchera Farms | Danbury, NE 69026 | $3,617,892 |
44 | Cruise Farms | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $3,600,981 |
45 | Owl Canyon Farms A Nebraska General Partnership | Madrid, NE 69150 | $3,546,463 |
46 | Adams Bank And Trust ** | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $3,362,172 |
47 | Hilgenkamp Farms Inc | Arlington, NE 68002 | $3,358,178 |
48 | Darrel & Jean Springer J Venture | Oak, NE 68964 | $3,277,992 |
49 | Dahlgren Cattle Co | Bertrand, NE 68927 | $3,240,401 |
50 | Leavitt Farms | Lincoln, NE 68527 | $3,174,763 |
51 | Tisthammer Farms Part | Albion, NE 68620 | $3,153,076 |
52 | Kc Farms | Sutton, NE 68979 | $3,150,473 |
53 | Triple T Farms | Ord, NE 68862 | $3,148,939 |
54 | Kennedy Brothers Partnership | Sutherland, NE 69165 | $3,140,437 |
55 | Janak Farms | Brainard, NE 68626 | $3,139,940 |
56 | Sugar Tree Farms | Hebron, NE 68370 | $3,124,092 |
57 | Kirkholm Farms | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $3,120,130 |
58 | C & R Farms | Imperial, NE 69033 | $3,111,151 |
59 | Triple G Farms Partnership | Louisville, NE 68037 | $3,099,250 |
60 | Merna Valley Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $3,094,161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”