Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 335
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Nebraska totaled $12,658,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gabus Family Nebraska Farms LLC | Hastings, NE 68902 | $20,108 |
42 | , | $20,056 | |
43 | Rebecca S Eckhardt | Holstein, NE 68950 | $20,048 |
44 | Larry R Hohlfeld | Holstein, NE 68950 | $19,781 |
45 | 3-d Farms Partnership | Juniata, NE 68955 | $19,639 |
46 | Cook Farms Of Juniata Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $18,260 |
47 | 1024 Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $18,184 |
48 | Benjamin L Trausch | Bladen, NE 68928 | $18,056 |
49 | Danny J Eckhardt | Holstein, NE 68950 | $17,433 |
50 | Daniel W Trausch | Roseland, NE 68973 | $17,126 |
51 | Tjh Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $15,900 |
52 | Kevin C Kober | Roseland, NE 68973 | $15,890 |
53 | Jason J Bonifas | Roseland, NE 68973 | $15,821 |
54 | Lloyd J Fischer | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $15,786 |
55 | Brian Bohlen | Hastings, NE 68901 | $15,477 |
56 | 3-j Family Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $15,349 |
57 | Mikita Farms, Inc. | Trumbull, NE 68980 | $15,345 |
58 | Rpj Land & Cattle Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $14,940 |
59 | David C Meyer - The David And Madeline Meyer Fam C | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $14,322 |
60 | Richard P Hubl Revocable Trust | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $14,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”