Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 846
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Nebraska totaled $14,506,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Nicholas Trausch | Roseland, NE 68973 | $24,595 |
102 | Rdo Farms Inc | Roseland, NE 68973 | $24,476 |
103 | Rentrag Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $24,313 |
104 | Neil Hemberger | Roseland, NE 68973 | $24,236 |
105 | Olsen Farms Inc | Heartwell, NE 68945 | $24,209 |
106 | 4-kimle Farms LLC | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $24,123 |
107 | Tjh Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $24,023 |
108 | Hemberger Farms Inc | Roseland, NE 68973 | $23,729 |
109 | Powell Brothers Ag LLC | Hastings, NE 68901 | $23,694 |
110 | Steve G Hubl | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $23,602 |
111 | 1024 Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $23,361 |
112 | Utecht Family Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $23,345 |
113 | Arlon D Jacobitz | Campbell, NE 68932 | $22,865 |
114 | Demuth Inc | Ayr, NE 68925 | $22,709 |
115 | 3-j Family Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $22,633 |
116 | Grothen Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $22,521 |
117 | Agri-plus Inc | Glenvil, NE 68941 | $22,498 |
118 | William Zimmerman | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $22,460 |
119 | Lonnie Rostvet | Ayr, NE 68925 | $22,378 |
120 | Double J Feedyards Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $22,121 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”