Loan Deficiency in Adams County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,565
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Adams County, Nebraska totaled $59,041,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Edward Eugene Consbruck | Juniata, NE 68955 | $119,888 |
162 | David M Kimle | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $119,688 |
163 | Csn Farms Inc | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $119,669 |
164 | Wayvic Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $118,967 |
165 | Daniel Brandenburger | Hastings, NE 68901 | $118,396 |
166 | Gerald Francis Konen | Juniata, NE 68955 | $118,277 |
167 | Michael R Karr | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $117,554 |
168 | Rodney W Bruntz | Hastings, NE 68901 | $116,991 |
169 | Beal Farms Inc | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $116,776 |
170 | E & S Farms, Inc. | Hastings, NE 68901 | $116,026 |
171 | Steven J Parr | Roseland, NE 68973 | $114,644 |
172 | Dennis Burr | Juniata, NE 68955 | $113,673 |
173 | Timothy L Hoffmann | Wood River, NE 68883 | $113,610 |
174 | Broad Meadow Inc | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $113,561 |
175 | Vernon Cook | Hastings, NE 68901 | $113,409 |
176 | John Hoffman | Juniata, NE 68955 | $113,154 |
177 | Ama Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $111,279 |
178 | Allen Schukei | Hastings, NE 68901 | $111,177 |
179 | Edwin Rief | Hastings, NE 68901 | $110,407 |
180 | Roger Shafer | Hastings, NE 68901 | $110,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”