Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Adams County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Adams County, Nebraska totaled $51,902 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stromer Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $5,043 |
2 | Hohlen R Pocket Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $4,464 |
3 | Lamoine Einspahr | Hastings, NE 68901 | $4,342 |
4 | Jaron D Jacobitz | Wood River, NE 68883 | $3,674 |
5 | C & A Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $3,468 |
6 | Roger Shafer | Hastings, NE 68901 | $3,316 |
7 | Herbert C Bonsack | Wood River, NE 68883 | $2,964 |
8 | Mcwhirter Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $2,879 |
9 | Kjb Enterprises | Minden, NE 68959 | $2,492 |
10 | Dean Jacobitz | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $2,391 |
11 | L & J W Inc | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $2,269 |
12 | David Shafer | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,982 |
13 | Ama Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,568 |
14 | Donald W Schroetlin | Sun City West, AZ 85375 | $1,459 |
15 | Dave C Van Boening | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $1,377 |
16 | 4 M Farms Inc | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $1,025 |
17 | Richard Schmidt | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $888 |
18 | Duane Lambrecht | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $851 |
19 | Dcj Farms Inc | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $835 |
20 | Orville E Duden Jr | Hastings, NE 68901 | $833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>