Farm Subsidy information
Banner County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Banner County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,228
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Banner County, Nebraska totaled $132,034,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Quarter Circle W Ranch Co | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $529,573 |
42 | Ruth K Linn Revocable Trust | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $528,104 |
43 | Martin Olsen | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $526,040 |
44 | Anderson Ranch & Farms Of Banner County Inc | Pine Bluffs, WY 82082 | $523,602 |
45 | Rick Larson Cattle Co | Potter, NE 69156 | $519,283 |
46 | Martha Mossberg | Kimball, NE 69145 | $510,009 |
47 | John Jones | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $502,871 |
48 | Benjamin Y Kim | Wagon Mound, NM 87752 | $487,811 |
49 | Roth Family Trust | Gering, NE 69341 | $487,040 |
50 | Lyle Huffman | Potter, NE 69156 | $482,355 |
51 | John Edens | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $481,011 |
52 | Laif Anderson | Pine Bluffs, WY 82082 | $478,030 |
53 | Robert E Pile | Gering, NE 69341 | $476,137 |
54 | Griffiths Farm & Ranch Trust | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $474,201 |
55 | Mike Hoehn Farm & Ranch Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $444,181 |
56 | Jx Ranch Inc | Potter, NE 69156 | $441,164 |
57 | Scott G Ansley | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $433,699 |
58 | Lazy Three J Ranch Inc | Bayard, NE 69334 | $424,660 |
59 | Curtis Cloud | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $423,135 |
60 | Jim Heilbrun | Bushnell, NE 69128 | $422,652 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”