Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 61
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $43,358 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David J Baker | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $617 |
22 | Ethel B Vandewalle Trust | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $595 |
23 | William J Robinson | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $553 |
24 | Leon Magsamen | Albion, NE 68620 | $548 |
25 | Richard Starman | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $519 |
26 | Bradley F Hupp | Albion, NE 68620 | $455 |
27 | Gloria R Rinkol | Columbus, NE 68601 | $414 |
28 | Roger William Beckman | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $413 |
29 | Krohn Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $398 |
30 | William David Primrose | Primrose, NE 68655 | $379 |
31 | Richard Allen Fangman | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $370 |
32 | Frederick H Tiede Conduit Revocab | Albion, NE 68620 | $314 |
33 | Baum & Bros Inc | Elgin, NE 68636 | $288 |
34 | Donald H Petsche | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $256 |
35 | George M Zegers | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $254 |
36 | Lawrence Stuhr Jr | Albion, NE 68620 | $254 |
37 | Raymond A Merrell | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $248 |
38 | David Scholl | Oakdale, NE 68761 | $228 |
39 | Fred C Spieker | Albion, NE 68620 | $216 |
40 | Frances Kay Cornwell | Belgrade, NE 68623 | $190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”