Counter Cyclical Program in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,097
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $12,578,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R And B Farms Inc | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $72,904 |
22 | Rankin & Sons | Albion, NE 68620 | $70,036 |
23 | Krohn Brothers Part | Albion, NE 68620 | $68,856 |
24 | Kenneth Iwan | Albion, NE 68620 | $67,070 |
25 | Daniel Lee Hemmer | Albion, NE 68620 | $63,723 |
26 | Michael Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $63,504 |
27 | William Henry Schriver | Albion, NE 68620 | $63,500 |
28 | Steven A Karmann | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $59,741 |
29 | Mogensen Bros Land & Cattle Co | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $59,059 |
30 | Brian T Swerczek | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $57,580 |
31 | Keber Farms Inc | Spalding, NE 68665 | $57,451 |
32 | Gottfried Lewis Buhlmann | Albion, NE 68620 | $57,024 |
33 | Virgil David Seda | Albion, NE 68620 | $56,796 |
34 | William David Primrose | Primrose, NE 68655 | $56,061 |
35 | Michael Lee Frey | Albion, NE 68620 | $55,738 |
36 | Keith Bittner | Albion, NE 68620 | $54,503 |
37 | Marilee Niewohner | Albion, NE 68620 | $54,200 |
38 | Ck Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $53,840 |
39 | Jerald Martin Nebel | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $53,416 |
40 | Bruce H Werner | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $53,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”