Direct Payment Program in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,454
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $56,522,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Keber Farms Inc | Spalding, NE 68665 | $295,788 |
22 | H L Molt & Sons | Albion, NE 68620 | $293,504 |
23 | William Henry Schriver | Albion, NE 68620 | $292,922 |
24 | Wolf Bros & Reich | Albion, NE 68620 | $283,384 |
25 | Beierman Farms | Albion, NE 68620 | $279,153 |
26 | Mjr Partners | Albion, NE 68620 | $279,042 |
27 | Loran D Naber | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $275,766 |
28 | Bruce H Werner | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $273,040 |
29 | Todd Allen Bremer | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $269,202 |
30 | Larry Rasmussen & Sons | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $267,652 |
31 | Cheryl L Werner | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $265,813 |
32 | K W Carter Co | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $264,015 |
33 | Eugene Duane Knust | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $258,581 |
34 | Charles Brian Beckwith | Albion, NE 68620 | $252,606 |
35 | Bradley Beckwith | Albion, NE 68620 | $252,606 |
36 | Daniel Raymond Schroeter | Albion, NE 68620 | $251,928 |
37 | Steven J Swerczek | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $250,055 |
38 | Mescher Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $249,163 |
39 | Tim James O'brien | Albion, NE 68620 | $247,588 |
40 | David Arnold Merrell | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $247,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”