Counter Cyclical Program in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,097
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $12,578,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Edward Kennedy Jr | Primrose, NE 68655 | $41,849 |
62 | Daniel Raymond Schroeter | Albion, NE 68620 | $41,754 |
63 | William Dean Klassen | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $41,557 |
64 | Kenneth Charles Schriver | Albion, NE 68620 | $40,329 |
65 | Gerhard Wolf | Tilden, NE 68781 | $40,175 |
66 | Michael Lynn Wolf | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $40,175 |
67 | David Cyril Prothman | Albion, NE 68620 | $40,086 |
68 | Ralph Lavern Pelster | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $39,608 |
69 | Lonnie Lee Rasmussen | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $38,652 |
70 | Alan Choat | Albion, NE 68620 | $38,502 |
71 | Paul A Preister | Newman Grove, NE 68758 | $37,877 |
72 | Dan Braun Farms Inc | Belgrade, NE 68623 | $37,691 |
73 | Roberts Bros | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $37,664 |
74 | Charles M Flood Revocable Trust | Newman Grove, NE 68758 | $37,610 |
75 | Brian Andreasen | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $37,588 |
76 | Robert Joseph Diessner | Primrose, NE 68655 | $37,399 |
77 | James Harlan Kohtz | Albion, NE 68620 | $37,124 |
78 | Mark Rodney Scott | Belgrade, NE 68623 | $36,827 |
79 | Raymond L Flood Revocable Trust-raymond L Flood | Newman Grove, NE 68758 | $36,673 |
80 | Kenneth E Young | Albion, NE 68620 | $36,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”