Counter Cyclical Program in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,097
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $12,578,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gary R Taake | Cape Coral, FL 33914 | $36,162 |
82 | Keith Otto Maricle | Albion, NE 68620 | $35,716 |
83 | Kenneth William Kerkman | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $35,659 |
84 | Scott Allen Sallach | Albion, NE 68620 | $35,601 |
85 | David Noble Remmereid | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $35,409 |
86 | Robert J Leslie Revocable Trust | Spalding, NE 68665 | $35,381 |
87 | James W O'brien | Albion, NE 68620 | $35,199 |
88 | Dale J Hemmer | Humphrey, NE 68642 | $34,875 |
89 | Darrel L Kolm | Primrose, NE 68655 | $34,853 |
90 | Barbara Jean Gasper | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $34,641 |
91 | Nicholas John Gasper | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $34,641 |
92 | Thomas M Schuele Jr | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $34,636 |
93 | Douglas Mark Stuhr | Albion, NE 68620 | $34,524 |
94 | Baum & Bros Inc | Elgin, NE 68636 | $34,214 |
95 | Seamann Farms Inc | Spalding, NE 68665 | $33,775 |
96 | Richard Alan Nauenburg | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $32,965 |
97 | Keith Rasmussen | Newman Grove, NE 68758 | $32,396 |
98 | Gene Wilfred Karmann | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $32,327 |
99 | Richard Ernest Nelson | Albion, NE 68620 | $32,283 |
100 | Duane Lawrence Choat | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $32,262 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”