Total Commodity Programs in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,441
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $317,586,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Martin John Laska | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $852,083 |
82 | Donald F Seier | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $850,106 |
83 | Kenneth Charles Schriver | Albion, NE 68620 | $838,315 |
84 | Harley George Guthard | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $838,114 |
85 | Gregory D Koetter | Albion, NE 68620 | $837,876 |
86 | Richard Allen Fangman | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $836,653 |
87 | Charles Eugene Braun | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $820,826 |
88 | Kenneth Charles Laska | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $819,287 |
89 | Anthony Joseph Braun | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $818,221 |
90 | Kenneth L Backes | Humphrey, NE 68642 | $816,861 |
91 | Wolf Land LLC | Albion, NE 68620 | $810,081 |
92 | Myron James Seier | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $798,477 |
93 | Groeteke Brothers Partnership | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $794,991 |
94 | John H Frey | Albion, NE 68620 | $785,242 |
95 | Dallas Leigh Choat | Albion, NE 68620 | $784,037 |
96 | Charles Joseph Laska | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $779,573 |
97 | Leo J Diessner | Primrose, NE 68655 | $775,455 |
98 | Christopher Carl Olson | Albion, NE 68620 | $775,097 |
99 | Randall Ketteler | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $774,049 |
100 | Nicholas John Gasper | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $768,831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”