Production Flexibility Program in Buffalo County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,833
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Buffalo County, Nebraska totaled $53,300,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark E Liesinger | Kearney, NE 68847 | $198,314 |
22 | Mark Meier | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $195,706 |
23 | Marvion Eugene Reichert Jr | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $191,584 |
24 | High Brothers Partnership | Bertrand, NE 68927 | $188,306 |
25 | Jay D Harnagel | Miller, NE 68858 | $182,758 |
26 | Hadwiger Ag Production, Inc | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $178,734 |
27 | Loran Hadwiger Rev Trust | Kearney, NE 68845 | $178,182 |
28 | Mercer Farms Inc | Gibbon, NE 68840 | $175,985 |
29 | Anthony A Hempleman | Shelton, NE 68876 | $175,949 |
30 | Randall E Merryman | Kearney, NE 68847 | $174,750 |
31 | Triple R Inc | Gibbon, NE 68840 | $174,111 |
32 | Jolyn Farms Inc | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $173,931 |
33 | Ohlman Bros Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $173,482 |
34 | Gary L Henderson | Kearney, NE 68847 | $167,162 |
35 | Daniel Riessland | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $166,679 |
36 | Mark J Muhlbach | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $166,568 |
37 | Connie Jo Riessland | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $166,387 |
38 | George C Bailey Jr | Gibbon, NE 68840 | $165,648 |
39 | William C Delaet Revocable Trust | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $164,866 |
40 | James L Skala Revocable Trust | Gibbon, NE 68840 | $164,749 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”