Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Buffalo County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 69
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Buffalo County, Nebraska totaled $571,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stanley Dean Ourada | Axtell, NE 68924 | $11,410 |
22 | Dean L Jones | Kearney, NE 68845 | $11,197 |
23 | Keith Bentley | Sumner, NE 68878 | $11,099 |
24 | Ripp Farms Inc | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $9,571 |
25 | Gardels Farms Inc | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $9,118 |
26 | Pauline Jacobson | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $9,100 |
27 | Bsj Farms Inc | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $8,982 |
28 | Roger Wolford Rev Trust | Kearney, NE 68847 | $8,738 |
29 | Charles C Wells Revocable Trust | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $8,376 |
30 | Leslie E Bentley | Miller, NE 68858 | $7,763 |
31 | Don Sullwold | Kearney, NE 68845 | $7,104 |
32 | Donald D Dealey Revocable Trust | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $6,549 |
33 | Vernon C Beavers | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $6,372 |
34 | Richard Lawrence Riessland | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $6,338 |
35 | Gordon C Schroll Revocable Trust | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $6,303 |
36 | Brian L Nickel | Gibbon, NE 68840 | $6,238 |
37 | Dennis W Reiter | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $6,213 |
38 | Rodney L Niemack Family Trust | Kearney, NE 68845 | $5,877 |
39 | Judith Niemack | Lincoln, NE 68520 | $5,875 |
40 | William G Keep | Elm Creek, NE 68836 | $5,857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”