Farm Subsidy information
Buffalo County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Buffalo County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,137
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Buffalo County, Nebraska totaled $20,294,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James-james & Sharon Riley Trust D Riley | Wood River, NE 68883 | $156,092 |
2 | Gangwish Family Farms | Shelton, NE 68876 | $144,516 |
3 | Rod Gangwish Farms LLC | Shelton, NE 68876 | $122,931 |
4 | Wood River Dairy LLC | Miller, NE 68858 | $120,755 |
5 | Twl LLC | Emery, SD 57332 | $101,285 |
6 | Fk Corp | Amherst, NE 68812 | $98,295 |
7 | Zero Hereford Ranch Inc | Miller, NE 68858 | $98,252 |
8 | Geisler Farms LLC | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $96,479 |
9 | Stanley Ourada Farms Inc | Axtell, NE 68924 | $92,631 |
10 | Garrett Keith Reese | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $81,427 |
11 | Kimble T Lewis | Kearney, NE 68847 | $79,748 |
12 | Amanda M Lewis | Kearney, NE 68847 | $79,748 |
13 | Arrow C Ranch Inc | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $76,465 |
14 | Mark S Hamilton | Kearney, NE 68847 | $75,850 |
15 | Michael A Nickman | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $74,648 |
16 | Michael D Twitchell | Kearney, NE 68847 | $73,503 |
17 | Schake Farms Inc | Kearney, NE 68845 | $72,675 |
18 | Hadwiger Ag Production, Inc | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $72,529 |
19 | J-6 Inc | Gibbon, NE 68840 | $71,362 |
20 | Lma Enterprises Llp | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $68,024 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>