Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Burt County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 90
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Burt County, Nebraska totaled $63,456 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jared Krause | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $7,017 |
2 | Daniel Erwin Kahlandt | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $4,235 |
3 | Mary Elizabeth Kahlandt | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $2,845 |
4 | Daniel Dean Johnson | Craig, NE 68019 | $2,157 |
5 | York Creek Red Angus Inc | Herman, NE 68029 | $2,110 |
6 | Petersen Tekamah Farms Inc | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $1,826 |
7 | Kurtis Eugene Pearson | Craig, NE 68019 | $1,741 |
8 | K P Ranch Inc | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $1,680 |
9 | Justin M Smith | Craig, NE 68019 | $1,656 |
10 | Colton Smith | Craig, NE 68019 | $1,360 |
11 | Triple T Simmentals | Arlington, NE 68002 | $1,343 |
12 | Stephen A Chatt | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $1,232 |
13 | Robert Anthony Chatt | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $1,232 |
14 | Edwin A Pearson | Craig, NE 68019 | $1,167 |
15 | Pruess Farms Inc | Craig, NE 68019 | $1,126 |
16 | Jensen Trust | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $1,107 |
17 | Michael Uhing | Craig, NE 68019 | $1,010 |
18 | Kevin Loftis | Craig, NE 68019 | $932 |
19 | Garrett Pearson | Oakland, NE 68045 | $915 |
20 | Sean Connealy | Decatur, NE 68020 | $897 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>