Total Conservation Programs in Butler County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 217
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Butler County, Nebraska totaled $1,119,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Clayton Kastl | Brainard, NE 68626 | $2,039 |
122 | Raymond Kohout | Dwight, NE 68635 | $1,983 |
123 | Brian K Goff | Linwood, NE 68036 | $1,977 |
124 | Rodney D And Cheryl A Reisen Joint Living Trust | Ashland, NE 68003 | $1,967 |
125 | Ronald J Anderson | Linwood, NE 68036 | $1,803 |
126 | Rudolph A And Harriet J Jakub Family Trust | David City, NE 68632 | $1,788 |
127 | Teresa M Otte | David City, NE 68632 | $1,770 |
128 | L & I Farms Inc | Ulysses, NE 68669 | $1,710 |
129 | Deborah L Kirschenman | Omaha, NE 68132 | $1,684 |
130 | Dean Heins | David City, NE 68632 | $1,673 |
131 | Beverly A Bennett Tr-hhh | David City, NE 68632 | $1,553 |
132 | Lazy J Cattle & Hay LLC | Brainard, NE 68626 | $1,538 |
133 | David L Potter | Valparaiso, NE 68065 | $1,537 |
134 | Mark D Sullivan | Brainard, NE 68626 | $1,521 |
135 | James Sklenar | David City, NE 68632 | $1,519 |
136 | Patricia Kouba Revocable Trust | David City, NE 68632 | $1,493 |
137 | Emil W Kouba Marital Deduction Trust | David City, NE 68632 | $1,493 |
138 | Brian Joseph Birkel | David City, NE 68632 | $1,474 |
139 | Klein Family Trust | Schuyler, NE 68661 | $1,446 |
140 | Douglas D Oppliger | Denver, CO 80220 | $1,433 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”