Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Cedar County, Nebraska, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 216

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Cedar County, Nebraska totaled $6,638,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
181Joseph M PottsFordyce, NE 68736$3,425
182Norma Jean Nelson Rev TrustDixon, NE 68732$3,327
183Donald A Nelson Rev TrustDixon, NE 68732$3,327
184David J FolkersHartington, NE 68739$3,310
185Daniel G WiedenfeldHartington, NE 68739$3,249
186Dean M KleinschmitCrofton, NE 68730$3,163
187Karl J KochHartington, NE 68739$2,833
188Allen SudbeckHartington, NE 68739$2,790
189Charles AlbersHartington, NE 68739$2,639
190D B A Ebberson FarmsColeridge, NE 68727$2,572
191Chad J WinkelbauerColeridge, NE 68727$2,475
192Evelyn ShalanderDixon, NE 68732$2,316
193Gregory Mark LackasCarroll, NE 68723$2,131
194Harold EickhoffHartington, NE 68739$1,812
195Holland Bros Trust Fbo Howard's CWisner, NE 68791$1,553
196Holland Bros Trust Fbo Martin HolWisner, NE 68791$1,545
197Holland Bros Trust Fbo Bradley HoWisner, NE 68791$1,545
198Anthony ArensCrofton, NE 68730$1,522
199Gerald J Suing And Joan M Suing RSaint Helena, NE 68774$1,316
200Batchelder Family Rev Living TrusDixon, NE 68732$1,281

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag