Farm Subsidy information
Chase County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Chase County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 444
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chase County, Nebraska totaled $17,758,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Star Unlimited Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $318,276 |
2 | Wine Glass Ranch Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $262,466 |
3 | Lone Star Ranch Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $230,758 |
4 | Bentz Valley Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $197,412 |
5 | Charlotte L Wallin | Imperial, NE 69033 | $180,172 |
6 | Mjm Land And Cattle Co | Wauneta, NE 69045 | $178,391 |
7 | Brianna Pribbeno | Imperial, NE 69033 | $151,660 |
8 | Luke W Tyerman | Imperial, NE 69033 | $151,188 |
9 | Hughes Family Farms Inc | Venango, NE 69168 | $150,547 |
10 | Jippi Milner | Champion, NE 69023 | $144,185 |
11 | Steven D Wallin | Imperial, NE 69033 | $134,590 |
12 | Stromberger Farms Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $130,940 |
13 | Robert D Milner | Champion, NE 69023 | $121,030 |
14 | Wayne D Krausnick | Imperial, NE 69033 | $106,428 |
15 | 44 Enterprises LLC | Imperial, NE 69033 | $96,414 |
16 | Hughes Land Company | Venango, NE 69168 | $94,241 |
17 | Frenchman Valley Ranch LLC | Imperial, NE 69033 | $90,130 |
18 | Dcn Farms Joint Venture | Imperial, NE 69033 | $88,423 |
19 | Marcia Yaw | Champion, NE 69023 | $86,948 |
20 | Marilee D Wallin | Imperial, NE 69033 | $75,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>