Counter Cyclical Program in Chase County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 654
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Chase County, Nebraska totaled $12,818,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Moreland Farms Inc | Valentine, NE 69201 | $35,125 |
142 | Melvin M Miller | Imperial, NE 69033 | $34,941 |
143 | Vance-vance And Rond V Mccoy | Elsie, NE 69134 | $34,791 |
144 | Robert Fanning | Wauneta, NE 69045 | $33,871 |
145 | Russell Schilke | Imperial, NE 69033 | $33,488 |
146 | Larges Farms Inc | Wauneta, NE 69045 | $33,360 |
147 | Richard Rice | Venango, NE 69168 | $33,011 |
148 | Flying S Land & Cattle Gp | Imperial, NE 69033 | $32,760 |
149 | Dean E Haarberg Living Trust | Imperial, NE 69033 | $32,233 |
150 | Stuart P Bartels | Wauneta, NE 69045 | $32,226 |
151 | Delmer Milner Trust | Champion, NE 69023 | $32,057 |
152 | Doris Schilke Revocable Trust | Imperial, NE 69033 | $31,981 |
153 | Duane Van Swanson | Keenesburg, CO 80643 | $31,404 |
154 | Krueger Enterprises Gp | Amherst, CO 80721 | $31,256 |
155 | Jess Bernard | Imperial, NE 69033 | $31,250 |
156 | Kelly Enterprise LLC | Champion, NE 69023 | $31,168 |
157 | Bill Tomky | Lamar, NE 69023 | $30,856 |
158 | Ray E Bahler | Lamar, NE 69023 | $30,421 |
159 | C & R Farms | Imperial, NE 69033 | $29,944 |
160 | David Mullanix | Lamar, NE 69023 | $28,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”