Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Cherry County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 111
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Cherry County, Nebraska totaled $4,551,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Danielski Harvesting & Farming | Valentine, NE 69201 | $1,337,531 |
2 | Double K Farms | Valentine, NE 69201 | $443,739 |
3 | Wesley H Hitchcock | Sparks, NE 69220 | $179,045 |
4 | Schied Ranch LLC | Omaha, NE 68135 | $156,127 |
5 | Ries Cattle Co Inc | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $153,453 |
6 | Shadbolt Cattle Co L P | Gordon, NE 69343 | $145,094 |
7 | Don Monroe | Valentine, NE 69201 | $133,015 |
8 | Hager Ranch Company LLC | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $114,277 |
9 | Jerry J Fullerton | Cody, NE 69211 | $110,697 |
10 | Daniel T Rogers | Purdum, NE 69157 | $84,066 |
11 | David R Rogers | Purdum, NE 69157 | $84,041 |
12 | Rick Weber | Valentine, NE 69201 | $81,053 |
13 | Eric Anderson | Gordon, NE 69343 | $72,330 |
14 | Witte Ranch LLC | Crookston, NE 69212 | $51,741 |
15 | Coby M Billings | Valentine, NE 69201 | $48,614 |
16 | Krueger Cattle Company | Valentine, NE 69201 | $48,484 |
17 | Byron A Stolzenburg Estate | Crookston, NE 69212 | $46,098 |
18 | Dr. William L Lawrence Jr | Sparks, NE 69220 | $45,889 |
19 | Michael Scott Assman | Mission, SD 57555 | $42,121 |
20 | Matthew Miles | Thedford, NE 69166 | $40,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>