Total Conservation Programs in Cheyenne County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 436
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cheyenne County, Nebraska totaled $2,426,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Arlene F Johnson | Potter, NE 69156 | $4,503 |
142 | , | $4,432 | |
143 | Lyle Huffman | Potter, NE 69156 | $4,428 |
144 | Bernice Ann Huffman | Potter, NE 69156 | $4,428 |
145 | Sharon Bigger | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $4,412 |
146 | Marilyn Luth | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $4,412 |
147 | Steven H Schumacher | Dalton, NE 69131 | $4,402 |
148 | Melvin Bundy | Gretna, NE 68028 | $4,361 |
149 | Ronald Evan Flowers | Buena Vista, CO 81211 | $4,334 |
150 | Miller Wht Farms Inc | Dalton, NE 69131 | $4,314 |
151 | , | $4,282 | |
152 | Keith And Nancy Rexroth Trust Of 2012 | Sidney, NE 69162 | $4,235 |
153 | Howard Fitz Jr | Fort Collins, CO 80521 | $4,229 |
154 | David Joseph Jessen | Sidney, NE 69162 | $4,209 |
155 | Karen R Bivens | Sidney, NE 69162 | $4,187 |
156 | Gary G Stein | Sidney, NE 69162 | $4,173 |
157 | Joan M Stein | Sidney, NE 69162 | $4,173 |
158 | James E B Stuart Living Trust | Papillion, NE 68046 | $4,097 |
159 | Donald And Evelyn Burge Living Trust | Spokane, WA 99204 | $4,074 |
160 | Randy L Twarling | Dalton, NE 69131 | $4,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”