Conservation Reserve Program in Cuming County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 220
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cuming County, Nebraska totaled $1,246,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clarence Wieberg | Dodge, NE 68633 | $16,053 |
22 | Kenneth W Schlecht | West Point, NE 68788 | $15,690 |
23 | , | $15,610 | |
24 | Wisner Feedlots Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $14,114 |
25 | Marcella Schlecht | West Point, NE 68788 | $13,971 |
26 | Jeremy W Ritter | Beemer, NE 68716 | $13,652 |
27 | Paul J Meyer | West Point, NE 68788 | $13,635 |
28 | William Goeden | West Point, NE 68788 | $13,583 |
29 | Dan Wortman | West Point, NE 68788 | $12,116 |
30 | Shirley Kreikemeier | West Point, NE 68788 | $11,652 |
31 | David Dahl | Scribner, NE 68057 | $11,468 |
32 | Aaron J Fisher | Brighton, CO 80602 | $10,987 |
33 | Randall Dunn | Pender, NE 68047 | $10,854 |
34 | Rita Throener | West Point, NE 68788 | $10,769 |
35 | Nick Luebbert | West Point, NE 68788 | $10,666 |
36 | Michael Gerken | West Point, NE 68788 | $10,317 |
37 | Karen Miserez | West Point, NE 68788 | $10,039 |
38 | Feyerherm Farm Inc | West Point, NE 68788 | $9,616 |
39 | Shane Batenhorst | Wisner, NE 68791 | $9,600 |
40 | Tim Reeson | West Point, NE 68788 | $9,188 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”