Counter Cyclical Program in Cuming County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,250
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cuming County, Nebraska totaled $10,301,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jerome Ortmeier | Dodge, NE 68633 | $22,717 |
122 | Patrick L Meiergerd | West Point, NE 68788 | $22,512 |
123 | Robert Engelmeyer | West Point, NE 68788 | $22,495 |
124 | Leroy Ulrich | West Point, NE 68788 | $22,412 |
125 | Thomas Engelmeyer | Valley, NE 68064 | $22,114 |
126 | Greg Kreikemeier | West Point, NE 68788 | $21,974 |
127 | Keith Doerneman | West Point, NE 68788 | $21,916 |
128 | Doug Malchow | Pender, NE 68047 | $21,909 |
129 | Eusterbrock Brothers | Dodge, NE 68633 | $21,890 |
130 | Myron N Nissen | Cedar Bluffs, NE 68015 | $21,879 |
131 | Albers Farms Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $21,742 |
132 | Theodore F Gentrup Jr | West Point, NE 68788 | $21,726 |
133 | Bernard H Clatanoff | Beemer, NE 68716 | $21,659 |
134 | Leroy A Timmerman | West Point, NE 68788 | $21,598 |
135 | David Schold | Oakland, NE 68045 | $21,149 |
136 | Kenneth F Batenhorst | West Point, NE 68788 | $20,957 |
137 | Dan J Brester | Howells, NE 68641 | $20,944 |
138 | Carter L Urwiler | Wisner, NE 68791 | $20,806 |
139 | Byron L Osten | Bancroft, NE 68004 | $20,469 |
140 | Holland Feedlot Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $20,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”