Conservation Reserve Program in Cuming County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 765
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cuming County, Nebraska totaled $21,905,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dean Adams | Wisner, NE 68791 | $177,553 |
22 | William Goeden | West Point, NE 68788 | $174,583 |
23 | Norbert Bracht Farms Inc | West Point, NE 68788 | $167,671 |
24 | Herbert Henjes | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $163,414 |
25 | Dennis A Schultz | Wisner, NE 68791 | $161,249 |
26 | Horst Living Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $159,102 |
27 | Vincent Rolf | West Point, NE 68788 | $151,526 |
28 | Von Seggern Farms Partnership | Wisner, NE 68791 | $151,518 |
29 | Shirley Kreikemeier | West Point, NE 68788 | $149,819 |
30 | Michael Gerken | West Point, NE 68788 | $148,322 |
31 | Marcella Schlecht | West Point, NE 68788 | $143,898 |
32 | Steffen Brothers Partnership | West Point, NE 68788 | $135,160 |
33 | Cmj Farm | Valley, NE 68064 | $134,743 |
34 | Shirley Irene Henjes | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $133,497 |
35 | John Throener | West Point, NE 68788 | $132,259 |
36 | Harold Loewe Estate | Beemer, NE 68716 | $132,127 |
37 | Feyerherm Farm Inc | West Point, NE 68788 | $131,844 |
38 | Paul J Meyer | West Point, NE 68788 | $131,012 |
39 | Leander Brester | Howells, NE 68641 | $129,384 |
40 | Clarence Wieberg | Dodge, NE 68633 | $124,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”