Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,064
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $21,855,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pirnie Bros Investment Co | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $52,163 |
42 | John Francis Beshaler | Arnold, NE 69120 | $52,117 |
43 | Mary Ellen Beshaler | Arnold, NE 69120 | $52,117 |
44 | Robert S Hahn | Amherst, NE 68812 | $51,809 |
45 | Neil Rex Ostrand | Mason City, NE 68855 | $51,599 |
46 | John Matthew Klooz | Purdum, NE 69157 | $51,493 |
47 | Don V Cain Jr | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $51,092 |
48 | Rodney David Lamb | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $50,809 |
49 | Douglas W Griebel | Comstock, NE 68828 | $49,570 |
50 | Bruce Lee Spangler | Callaway, NE 68825 | $49,442 |
51 | Kyle David Cantrell | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $49,392 |
52 | Gina Louise Cantrell | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $49,392 |
53 | Glen Govier & Sons | Sargent, NE 68874 | $48,099 |
54 | Mba Livestock | Kearney, NE 68845 | $47,614 |
55 | Donald D. Olson Revocable Trust | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $47,014 |
56 | Guy Leland Mills Jr | Ansley, NE 68814 | $46,392 |
57 | Cool Farms Inc | Callaway, NE 68825 | $46,137 |
58 | Dalen Moody | Sargent, NE 68874 | $46,007 |
59 | Donald D Griebel | Comstock, NE 68828 | $45,325 |
60 | Garry Lee Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $44,353 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”