Total Emergency Relief Program in Custer County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 200
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $2,483,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Zimmer | Mason City, NE 68855 | $10,637 |
42 | Edward Charles Wehling-ed Wehling Revocable Living | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $10,524 |
43 | Frank Patrick Potter | Callaway, NE 68825 | $10,347 |
44 | James Phelps | Callaway, NE 68825 | $9,945 |
45 | Randy L Fiorelli Living Rev Tr | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $9,896 |
46 | Charles Bradley Kleeb | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $9,735 |
47 | , | $9,688 | |
48 | Kyle Dean Geiser | Merna, NE 68856 | $9,272 |
49 | Clyde Edward Arnold | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $9,232 |
50 | Barry Joel Rosentreader | Mason City, NE 68855 | $9,206 |
51 | Adam E Larsen | Merna, NE 68856 | $9,116 |
52 | Finney Brothers Ranch LLC | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $8,888 |
53 | Pandorf Land & Cattle Inc | Callaway, NE 68825 | $8,633 |
54 | John Philip Blakeman | Merna, NE 68856 | $8,613 |
55 | John Francis Beshaler | Arnold, NE 69120 | $8,585 |
56 | Bartak Brothers Inc | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $8,391 |
57 | Maynard Doyle Struempler | Oconto, NE 68860 | $8,379 |
58 | Rodney Dean Schweitzer | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $8,376 |
59 | Conrad George Pelster | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $8,360 |
60 | Thomas Dean Christen | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $8,312 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”