Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,064
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $21,855,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas Dean Christen | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $43,570 |
62 | Conner & Conner Inc | Arnold, NE 69120 | $43,165 |
63 | Ronald Dean Schmidt | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $42,997 |
64 | Darrell Ray Schmidt | Merna, NE 68856 | $42,997 |
65 | Thomas Allen Hoesel | Callaway, NE 68825 | $42,376 |
66 | Gary W Cook- Gary W Cook Living Revocable Trust | Berwyn, NE 68814 | $42,285 |
67 | Lane Eric Sommer | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $42,276 |
68 | David Glen Beals | Merna, NE 68856 | $41,969 |
69 | Rodney Dean Schweitzer | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $41,751 |
70 | Jeff J Corbin | Arnold, NE 69120 | $40,720 |
71 | Joel David Bailey | Ansley, NE 68814 | $40,415 |
72 | Jaimee Rachelle Bailey | Ansley, NE 68814 | $40,415 |
73 | David Henry Haumont | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $39,567 |
74 | Myers Ld & Cattle Inc | Eddyville, NE 68834 | $37,835 |
75 | Bartak Brothers Inc | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $37,830 |
76 | Nicholas K Ernesti | Sargent, NE 68874 | $37,318 |
77 | Joseph Frank Horky Jr | Sargent, NE 68874 | $36,903 |
78 | Donald David Cantrell | Merna, NE 68856 | $36,608 |
79 | Debra Diane Cantrell | Merna, NE 68856 | $36,608 |
80 | Craig Daniel Ottun | Sargent, NE 68874 | $36,495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”