Market Loss Assistance Program in Custer County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,397
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $27,607,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Donald D Griebel | Comstock, NE 68828 | $76,915 |
82 | Art Anderson Farms Inc | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $76,667 |
83 | Richard Dean Fenske | Comstock, NE 68828 | $76,296 |
84 | Donald D. Olson Revocable Trust | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $74,563 |
85 | Jolene M Olson Revocable Trust | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $74,560 |
86 | Randy Lee Fiorelli | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $74,235 |
87 | Robert Lynn Schneringer | Callaway, NE 68825 | $74,065 |
88 | Kasey Zac Tobias | Sargent, NE 68874 | $73,871 |
89 | Darrell Ray Schmidt | Merna, NE 68856 | $73,090 |
90 | Ronald Dean Schmidt | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $73,086 |
91 | Douglas Dwain Dockweiler | Callaway, NE 68825 | $72,823 |
92 | John Allen Luehm | Ord, NE 68862 | $72,347 |
93 | Lane Eric Sommer | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $71,408 |
94 | Cary Al Sommer | Callaway, NE 68825 | $71,408 |
95 | Shane Elof Cool | Arnold, NE 69120 | $71,359 |
96 | David Steven Beck | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $71,212 |
97 | Jerry Ray Peterson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $71,042 |
98 | Dean Peterson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $71,042 |
99 | Craig Jay Peterson | Westerville, NE 68881 | $70,845 |
100 | Arnold Brothers | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $70,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”