Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Custer County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 174
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $4,664,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Zachary Lee Bartak | Merna, NE 68856 | $7,792 |
102 | Jeff Gordon Bartak | Merna, NE 68856 | $7,792 |
103 | F Logan Govier | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $7,613 |
104 | Marilyn Seefeld | Columbus, NE 68601 | $7,595 |
105 | Leland-leland Dale C Dale Cantrel | Cashmere, WA 98815 | $7,559 |
106 | James Cody Carlson | Arnold, NE 69120 | $7,253 |
107 | Ardes A Slagle | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $7,103 |
108 | Philip Lamb | Yakima, WA 98908 | $6,973 |
109 | Johnson Family Trust | Lincoln, NE 68506 | $6,812 |
110 | Dan Bruce Slagle | Sargent, NE 68874 | $6,651 |
111 | Art Anderson Farms Inc | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $6,274 |
112 | Bence Family LLC | Lincoln, NE 68502 | $6,252 |
113 | Gage Nic Ostergard Jr | Callaway, NE 68825 | $6,131 |
114 | Timothy Wayne Mason | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $6,098 |
115 | Keith Leroy Carlson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $5,910 |
116 | Jodi Lynn Carlson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $5,910 |
117 | Garth Grayling Ostergard | Cozad, NE 69130 | $5,859 |
118 | Tyson L Holcomb | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $5,636 |
119 | Safranek Irrigation | Merna, NE 68856 | $5,590 |
120 | Vogel Enterprises Inc | Arnold, NE 69120 | $5,432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”