Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,658
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $595,487,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tri-s Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $6,472,319 |
2 | Pandorf Land & Cattle Inc | Callaway, NE 68825 | $3,276,548 |
3 | Merna Valley Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $3,108,428 |
4 | Amsberry Farms Ltd | Ansley, NE 68814 | $2,932,053 |
5 | Safranek Irrigation | Merna, NE 68856 | $2,886,157 |
6 | Adams Land & Cattle, LLC | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $2,565,045 |
7 | Adams Farm Partnership | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $2,561,332 |
8 | Pirnie Bros Investment Co | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $2,446,782 |
9 | Ross Land & Cattle LLC | Callaway, NE 68825 | $2,224,202 |
10 | Garry Lee Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $2,223,941 |
11 | Blowers Farms LLC | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $1,969,009 |
12 | R Cool Ranch Co | Callaway, NE 68825 | $1,966,486 |
13 | Conner & Conner Inc | Arnold, NE 69120 | $1,925,392 |
14 | Bartak/bartak | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $1,892,176 |
15 | John Francis Beshaler | Arnold, NE 69120 | $1,875,649 |
16 | August Shane Rohde | Mason City, NE 68855 | $1,832,228 |
17 | Ronald Dean Schmidt | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $1,805,772 |
18 | Darrell Ray Schmidt | Merna, NE 68856 | $1,804,126 |
19 | Thomas Livestock Inc | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $1,797,875 |
20 | Lamb Farm And Feedyard | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $1,785,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>