Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Custer County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 983
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $7,839,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Orrin E Hoblyn | Mason City, NE 68855 | $31,471 |
42 | Lynn Estergard | Oconto, NE 68860 | $31,326 |
43 | Roger L Seda | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $31,093 |
44 | David Henry Haumont | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $31,020 |
45 | Larry L Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $30,928 |
46 | Rejda Brothers Inc | Burwell, NE 68823 | $30,687 |
47 | Rpj Cattle Co | Mason City, NE 68855 | $28,858 |
48 | Steven Wayne Miller | Callaway, NE 68825 | $28,158 |
49 | Finney Brothers Ranch LLC | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $27,911 |
50 | Michael Lynn Seevers | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $27,793 |
51 | Marvin Lynn Schultz | Sargent, NE 68874 | $27,626 |
52 | Brian Douglas Berg | Oconto, NE 68860 | $27,405 |
53 | Eugene R Mcgown | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $27,092 |
54 | Kenneth And Cheryl Shoemaker Living Trust | Mason City, NE 68855 | $26,963 |
55 | Dean H Kaelin | Ansley, NE 68814 | $26,622 |
56 | James Francis Beran | Sargent, NE 68874 | $26,432 |
57 | Lynn Hall | Dunning, NE 68833 | $26,084 |
58 | Mick Reed Peterson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $25,996 |
59 | South Loup Valley Ash Creek Ranch | Eddyville, NE 68834 | $25,989 |
60 | Kyle Dean Geiser | Merna, NE 68856 | $25,968 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”