Deficiency Payment in Dakota County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 365
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Dakota County, Nebraska totaled $966,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charelene Stone | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $11,799 |
22 | Kenneth A Bartels | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $11,622 |
23 | Charles Nelson | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $11,508 |
24 | Jenkins Farms Inc | Homer, NE 68030 | $10,997 |
25 | Linda Rae Walsh | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $10,988 |
26 | Duane C Rohde | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $10,616 |
27 | Elk Creek Land & Cattle Co. | Wakefield, NE 68784 | $10,194 |
28 | J Roger Hubbard | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $9,983 |
29 | Daniel L Bloomfield | Ponca, NE 68770 | $9,776 |
30 | Douglas R Garwood | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $9,685 |
31 | Steve Olson Farms, Inc | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $9,666 |
32 | Jon C Olson Farms, Inc | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $9,666 |
33 | James L Olson Farms Inc | Sloan, IA 51055 | $9,666 |
34 | Gary E Olson Farms, Inc | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $9,666 |
35 | Milo W Birkley | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $9,495 |
36 | Phyllis J Birkley | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $9,495 |
37 | Douglas E Nelson | Jackson, NE 68743 | $9,383 |
38 | Kramper Bros | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $8,700 |
39 | Rodney Edward Rohde | Emerson, NE 68733 | $8,200 |
40 | Suzanne M Dorcey | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $8,127 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”