Farm Subsidy information
Dakota County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Dakota County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 137
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dakota County, Nebraska totaled $8,624,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Beermann Rohde | Homer, NE 68030 | $19,866 |
42 | Michael Wilmes | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $19,110 |
43 | James K Bliven | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $17,870 |
44 | , | $17,257 | |
45 | Ryan L Stewart | West Point, NE 68788 | $16,535 |
46 | Goodwin Farms LLC | Jackson, NE 68743 | $16,514 |
47 | Brandon J Rush | Jackson, NE 68743 | $15,464 |
48 | T J P Enterprises Inc | Omaha, NE 68117 | $15,020 |
49 | Dan & Pearl Hartnett Farms Inc | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $14,493 |
50 | Marlyn L Stewart | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $13,778 |
51 | Big Momma G, L.l.c. | Sioux City, IA 51108 | $13,540 |
52 | Gordon S Hansen | Waterbury, NE 68785 | $13,422 |
53 | Donald E Hogh | Jackson, NE 68743 | $13,395 |
54 | Amy Lyn Utech | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $12,776 |
55 | Ryan Bousquet | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $12,676 |
56 | Ginger Gill-jonesin 4 Gills LLC | Sioux City, IA 51108 | $12,618 |
57 | Calvin A Hansen | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $12,598 |
58 | Dean A Lieber | Jackson, NE 68743 | $12,429 |
59 | Gregory W Utech | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $12,329 |
60 | Robert J Anderson | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $12,291 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”