Emergency Conservation Program in Dakota County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Dakota County, Nebraska totaled $881,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kirkholm Family Farms Partnership | Homer, NE 68030 | $259,868 |
2 | Andersen Family Farms | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $204,922 |
3 | Grainbelt Farms LLC | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $199,996 |
4 | Bousquet Dairy Inc | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $84,840 |
5 | Jenkins Farms Inc | Homer, NE 68030 | $15,773 |
6 | Brandon J Olson | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $12,459 |
7 | Trenton Kody Olson | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $12,459 |
8 | Tanner Brett Olson | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $12,459 |
9 | J Hartnett Farms Inc | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $11,891 |
10 | James E Nelson | Jackson, NE 68743 | $10,148 |
11 | Jon C Olson Farms, Inc | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $8,275 |
12 | Steve Olson Farms, Inc | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $8,272 |
13 | Charles Wayne Risse | Interior, SD 57750 | $8,272 |
14 | Lou Twohig | Jackson, NE 68743 | $6,406 |
15 | Gary R Nelson | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $5,828 |
16 | Nona J Mayberry | Montrose, CO 81401 | $3,536 |
17 | Sallee D Peterson | Arvada, CO 80005 | $3,000 |
18 | Donald E Hogh | Jackson, NE 68743 | $2,525 |
19 | James L Gabel | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $2,138 |
20 | Robb Michael Nelson | Jackson, NE 68743 | $1,935 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>