Total Commodity Programs in Dakota County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 860
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dakota County, Nebraska totaled $88,075,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jon C Olson Farms, Inc | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $932,340 |
22 | Gary E Olson Farms, Inc | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $915,317 |
23 | Robb Micheal Nelson | Jackson, NE 68743 | $893,319 |
24 | Charles L Beermann | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $885,986 |
25 | Martin D Rohde | Emerson, NE 68733 | $864,373 |
26 | James K Bliven | Dakota City, NE 68731 | $837,141 |
27 | Kenneth A Bartels | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $795,207 |
28 | Christina A Nelson | Jackson, NE 68743 | $761,145 |
29 | Kevin L Pedersen | Jackson, NE 68743 | $716,190 |
30 | Bousquet Dairy Inc | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $674,215 |
31 | Michael Edward Mitchell | Jackson, NE 68743 | $669,699 |
32 | Duane C Rohde | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $662,745 |
33 | Gerald Joseph Walsh | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $657,464 |
34 | Thomas D Love | Jackson, NE 68743 | $657,172 |
35 | Amy Lyn Utech | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $645,040 |
36 | Ira A Love & Judy A Love Revocabl | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $635,221 |
37 | Criss Farms | Hubbard, NE 68741 | $633,785 |
38 | Dean A Lieber | Jackson, NE 68743 | $633,319 |
39 | Bousquet Dairy | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $618,856 |
40 | Dennis D Rohde | Emerson, NE 68733 | $599,163 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”